Carville: Ilhan Omar Should Leave Democratic Party, Do Her Own Thing

Democratic political strategist James Carville reiterated previous criticism of Ilhan Omar during a recent podcast appearance, again suggesting the progressive lawmaker should consider leaving the Democratic Party.

Carville made the remarks during an interview on Straight Shooter, hosted by Stephen A. Smith. Smith asked Carville about comments he made in May 2025 on his podcast, Politics War Room, in which he sharply criticized Omar, a member of the progressive group of lawmakers often referred to as “the Squad.”

Carville, who made a name for himself as an adviser to then-President Bill Clinton, indicated his views had not changed since the earlier remarks and again questioned Omar’s role within the Democratic Party.

Trump Gets Historic Support From Voting Base: Report
Read More
His comments reflect ongoing divisions among Democrats over the party’s ideological direction and the influence of progressive lawmakers in Congress.

“Lady, why don’t you just get out of the Democratic Party,” Carville said about Omar. “Honestly, start your own movement.”

His initial calls for Omar to leave the party were in response to a 2018 interview she gave to Middle East outlet Al Jazeera. Omar, who is married to a white man, falsely said “our country should be more fearful of white men because they’re causing most of the deaths within this country.”

According to 2023 FBI and Justice Department crime statistics, while whites commit the most murders in terms of raw numbers, black males are six times more likely to victimize other blacks.

Carville stated that Omar was a “very, attractive, soft-spoken lady,” he didn’t agree on her attacks on white men, explicitly calling her to “stop.”

“About 33% of the people that are gonna vote are gonna be white males,” Carville said. “Well, it’s stupid to attack 33% of the voters!”

“And so what I would say to Congresswoman Omar, ‘Why don’t you be a Democratic Socialist of America?’ Do what AOC did, and then if they win, the truth of that is, I share a lot of ideological issues in common with Congressman Omar, but maybe you should do like a parliamentary government. We’ll let you in the governing coalition, but not the electoral coalition,” Carville said.

“But we cannot- we have to get this mentality out that we can win national elections [without] White people, because you can’t,” Carville continued. “That we can somehow or another win an election without white males. It’s just insanity. It’s literally mathematical insanity, cultural insanity.”

“All white people are not the same. All black people are not the same. All Hispanic people are not the same, all right? ” Carville added. “And I don’t like generalizing about someone’s gender or their race or their sexual preference or anything else. All gay people are not the same. They’re very different personalities. They’re very different values, very different everything.”

Omar faced backlash after falsely claiming the United States deliberately targets Muslim nations during Ramadan. “Iraq was attacked by the US during Ramadan and it is sickening to know that the US is again going to attack Iran during Ramadan,” Omar wrote on X as tensions escalated ahead of a U.S. strike on Iran.

“The US apparently loves to strike Muslim countries during Ramadan and I am convinced it isn’t what these countries have done to violate international law but about who they worship,” she added.

But critics noted what she said was categorically incorrect. Also, they argued that such rhetoric, delivered during an active military standoff, risks giving adversaries propaganda they can weaponize.

Under the Constitution, treason is narrowly defined as levying war against the United States or adhering to its enemies, giving them aid and comfort. Legal scholars have long noted that the “aid and comfort” standard requires intent and tangible support, not merely controversial speech.

Va. Judge Rules Dem-Led Redistricting Plan Violates State Law

A Virginia judge on Tuesday ruled that a proposed constitutional amendment that would allow state Democrats to redraw the commonwealth’s congressional maps was illegal, a decision that dealt a setback to efforts to reshape district boundaries ahead of the 2026 U.S. House elections.

Tazewell County Circuit Court Judge Jack Hurley Jr. found that lawmakers failed to follow several procedural and constitutional requirements when advancing the amendment, including not meeting the required notice and publication deadlines and attempting to take up the measure during a legislative session not properly authorized for constitutional changes. As a result, he declared the amendment void.

The amendment, passed by both chambers of the Democrat-controlled Virginia General Assembly in January, would have put a mid-decade redistricting plan before voters that could have significantly increased Democratic representation in Congress. Opponents argued the process violated state law and constitutionally required procedures for amending the charter.

Supporters of the amendment said Republicans were seeking a favorable ruling by filing the lawsuit in a more conservative jurisdiction and vowed to continue fighting the decision. Both sides have indicated plans to appeal the judge’s ruling.

Virginians for Fair Elections, a campaign supporting the redistricting resolution, stated that an appeal is anticipated, the Washington Times reported.

“Republicans court-shopped for a ruling because litigation and misinformation are the only tools they have left,” campaign manager Keren Charles Dongo said. “We’re prepared for what comes next, and Virginians deserve both the right to vote and the chance to level the playing field.”

The ruling comes amid a broader, nationwide struggle over redistricting and mid-decade map changes in multiple states, with both parties using litigation and legislative strategies to influence the balance of power in the U.S. House of Representatives.